College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Wilkes casts alumnus in lead role of Dracula

Gillyan Gowarty

Published: Friday, February 26, 2010

Updated: Monday, March 1, 2010

On Friday, January 22, students of Wilkes University took to the stage to audition for various parts in the school’s upcoming theatre production,

Dracula

, which will be presented this April.


Junior John Layton had planned on trying out for the lead role and was surprised to find a familiar face reading for the same spot—Daniel Pascoe, a graduate of the Class of 2009.

Having only previously worked with current Wilkes undergraduate students - and occasionally a child or two from the Conservatory - in Wilkes productions, Layton said he questioned the audition policy and was told that auditions for Dracula were open to the public, meaning anyone from the surrounding community could audition for a part.

According to Layton, this was the first he heard of an open audition policy. Of the four productions held this year—The Love of the Nightingale, Brenda Bly: Teen Detective, The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee and Dracula—Layton said that Pascoe was the only community member who auditioned for a role.

The Visual and Performing Arts Department’s page on the Wilkes Web site states that the department “is committed to nurturing a climate in which a community of artists-educators, diverse student population, and the public-at-large engage in art, dance, music, and theatre.”

While this statement mentions that the “public-at-large” are allowed to “engage” in the department’s productions, it does not distinguish between engaging as part of the audience or as a member of the cast.

Several attempts were made to contact members of the Visual and Performing Arts Department to clarify the auditioning policy, but faculty declined to share details of the casting process with The Beacon.

Despite the unclear rules that may be in place regarding casting, current and former theatre majors feel that the casting of alumni or members of the community in a Wilkes production is unfair.

Christopher Lucas, Class of 2007, sent a letter to The Beacon to air his feelings on the situation.

“There are students that are paying over $100,000 over the course of their four-year stint at Wilkes University for a quality education and I feel by casting an alumnus, you are not only cheating them out of their money, but cheating them out of a quality education,” Lucas, a theatre graduate. “It feels as though part of the money that they are putting in as a student is being handed over to the alumnus actor.”

Layton agreed, stating that current students should be given these opportunities to prepare them for their careers. He added that holding open auditions for a student production does not make sense because student productions should be filled by students.

“I’m sure the [Wilkes] football team would love to have Peyton Manning come and play if they were allowed to have open try outs,” said Layton.

Lucas also added in his letter that casting former Wilkes students or members of the community weighs on current students’ confidence levels. He said that Wilkes students may think that the directors may feel that they “do not currently have the talent pool amongst their current students to be able to play a lead role in a main stage production” and must search elsewhere to fulfill these roles.

Layton agreed. “We all go to Wilkes and if we’re not good enough to play this part, are they training us the right way?” he asked.

With an open audition policy, Layton questioned how Wilkes’ theatre productions are any different from those put on by community theatres. Representatives of the department would not provide The Beacon with information that would clarify the differences between these two types of productions.

Upset with the decision to cast a non-Wilkes student in Dracula, Layton said he contacted Joseph Dawson, chair of the Visual and Performing Arts department, for further clarification on the audition policies. But when he didn’t get a direct answer regarding the policy, he told Dawson he would not feel comfortable attending rehearsal for The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee.

“He called me back and gave me the ultimatum-that if I wasn’t at rehearsal, then I wasn’t in the production. And I decided not to go,” said Layton.

Layton not only chose to abandon his part in Putnam County, but also to leave the department entirely. Layton said he has decided to drop theatre and will soon declare an English major. He has also considered transferring to another college or university.

After leaving Putnam County, Layton said he expected that one of the two assistant stage managers would fulfill his empty role. Although there are no formal understudies for Wilkes productions, assistant stage managers act as such and are prepared and willing to fill deserted positions.

“People have told me that [Tony Goreczny] was preparing [to fill Layton’s role] and was rehearsing,” said Layton.

Goreczny, a freshman theatre major and one of the assistant stage managers for Putnam County, was not called upon to play the part, however. Instead, Pascoe picked up where Layton left off.

“I consider the theater department’s choice of replacing John Layton with Daniel Pascoe to be a slap in the face [to Layton], considering the fact that John left his major after the unexpected Dracula event,” said Austin Loukas, a freshman psychology major who tried out for Layton’s empty role in Putnam County before Pascoe was given the role.

Both Goreczny and Pascoe declined to comment on these, or any other, matters.
Numerous attempts were made to contact Teresa Fallon, director of the upcoming Dracula, but phone calls and emails were not returned. Dawson was the director of Putnam County, but declined to comment on the situation.

While Dawson did not wish to comment specifically about casting procedures either, he directed The Beacon to the academic grievances protocol that is listed on page 88 of the Student Handbook.

The handbook states that “students having academic grievances should first confer with the instructor involved. The route of appeal is the department chairperson, the dean of the school, and the Provost.”

“The student in question [Layton] merely informed the instructor [Teresa Fallon] that he was dropping his major,” said Dawson. “As far as I know he has still not addressed the casting issue with her. As a result he has not allowed himself to become educated on the intricacies of casting. He bypassed protocol by emailing me first, and even before I could respond went to the Dean and then The Beacon. Clearly not protocol … If students are encouraged to follow protocol by first bringing grievances to instructors then uncomplicated issues would have a slimmer chance of being sensationalized.”

Dawson would not comment on the “intricacies of casting” he mentioned, stating that if students wished to find answers to their questions regarding casting decisions, they are to speak with the faculty directors who are involved with the theatre productions.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments Log in to Comment

The_Beacon,Freelancepilot@aol.com
Sat Mar 13 2010 16:31
This just happened to me at my school, though I wasn't trying out for a lead, but a bit part. I actually stumbled on this board while googling to see if it was OK for schools to do this.

Frankly, I am quite pissed, as the fellow who quit his show is...however, while in another production...I refuse to quit mine to make a statement. I believe my talents however, are not what my school is looking for and I will just not audition with them anymore.

The issue comes with it being a student theater. I don't believe you should hold a professional standard, or open call for any school theater...from HS, to JuCo, and up to the University level. Grad Students on the one hand are an exception because they still attend the university...but for an Alumni to get the nod over a student is a horrible choice.

Take basketball. Its like having a NBA player come and play on your intramural basketball team, because you want to win. You ignore all the other kids waiting for a team, but focus on your own personal goals...and in this case, your theater (as well as mine) is ignoring the students who are paying to attend the school, just to put on a "quality" show.

I quote quality, because ANYONE can put on a good show. While this kid may not have been the best Dracula there, I'm sure he could have rose to the occasion or even challenged his craft to become a better actor. Hell even if he failed at the role, he could have walked away with something...and while its not the "Directors" job to teach an actor anything, it is the schools position to put there students in the BEST position to become professionals.

I'm sorry, but this department has failed its students, as have mine. Its not about the director, its about his students, and it seems like your school, along with mine...has forgotten that.

Katrina Zbegner
Tue Mar 9 2010 12:51
The main difference is the students in the dance classes were made aware of Courtnay’s presence and in what capacity she would be aiding the show. The students who auditioned for Dracula were not informed, and therefore Dan’s presence was a shock. This difference is from the situation being handled poorly by the Director.

Side Note- Also as an actress it is much helpful and educating to work along side someone who knows what they are doing, commits themselves to role, and is well suited. Working with someone who doesn’t fit can be a challenge, and not the good kind.

This whole ordeal is beginning to blow over, and that is what is best for everyone. This article didn’t help the situation. I want what’s best for this show. No other male in our department handled himself the way John did after auditions for Dracula were over. I feel that this says something about John, and not in a positive way. The cast will rehearse for Dracula until it’s performance in April, and hopefully we will all be able to put this behind us.

Katrina Zbegner
Tue Mar 9 2010 12:49
One of the first lessons you learn on the road to becoming an actor is how to face rejection. John Layton will face much rejection in his future as an actor if he never learns how to choose roles that are best suited for him and his type. Is John a Dracula? No, no he is not. The university would be doing John a disservice leading him to believe that these are the roles he should be aiming for when he goes on auditions. Now, is John a Harker? Yes, he most certainly is and his chances of landing this coveted role were very high. Being in attendance at the auditions I can say that John had a much stronger audition as Harker, then he did as Dracula. If we are basing the casting of Dracula off auditions, then doesn't it make sense that the male with the strongest audition should be cast as this part? No male student had a strong or impressive audition for Dracula, and from the pool of males we have in the department there is no one that fits the type. Therefore, the Director went outside of the department to cast the role. In my opinion, I would rather see the department look elsewhere for someone who can play the role well and make it a strong performance, then cast someone who had an okay audition and would make the show less then what it had the potential to be. We have many talented males in our department, that wasn't the problem. The problem was merely the type of male needed, which we simply did not possess. As for Dan Pascoe being cast, he declined the offer many times, before agreeing to be cast because of encouragement from the Director. Asking someone from the community, alum or not is not something that is rare at Wilkes, and as stated from previous posts has happened numerous times at Wilkes. No rules were broken, and let me also restate Dan was ASKED to HELP us with our production. He did not randomly show up looking for something to fill up his spare time. Dan weighed the pros and cons of the situation, he did not hastily make a decision and he was not trying to step on anyone’s shoes. Since graduating Dan has been working on theatre projects in the area as well as working to save money, while preparing to leave the area to further his career. Dan is extremely talented, one of the most talented males I have seen grace the stage while studying here at Wilkes. He has mastered the art of dance, voice, and acting, and puts his heart and soul into what he does. And it shows. There is nothing "semi good" about Dan's talent. Dan is good, very good. There is also nothing "pathetic" about Dan's actions. In regards to Dan being cast in Putnam, that never would have happened if John Layton hadn't immaturely not shown up to a rehearsal where the cast was relying on him. Joe explored every other option before casting Dan, and Joe was also very hesitant to cast Dan, but was only trying to do what was best for his students so they could have an excellent show. In life you don’t get everything that you want, as an actor you won’t get every role you want or think you deserve, and how you handle your self in these situations is a true test a character. In my opinion, John failed. If John felt that Dan being cast was unfair and wanted to remove himself from being a part of Dracula that’s understandable. However, if John wanted to remove himself from the department and the current show he was cast in he should have done that in a respectable manner. Instead of calling the director for Spelling Bee explaining the situation in a mature fashion John decided he was just not going to show up to rehearsal. That’s not making a stand, that’s being extremely inconsiderate to your fellow cast mates, your director, and your stage management. These are all people who are counting on you, and trust you to be part of the family that you develop when working so closely together. John broke that trust, and the way he approached handling the situation was wrong.Regarding Dracula, I will say that it was a bad show to choose and our Director should have put more thought into picking a show that would showcase the students that are currently attending Wilkes, and that would all fit the roles and types in said play. Unfortunately, this was not the case. Dracula was chosen, and we needed to search outside the department to fill a role. Do I feel that it is completely fair? No. I understand why some of our male students were upset, but our director felt that casting Dan was what needed to be done for the show, and was not changing their mind anytime soon. I feel our Director handled it poorly and should have informed students earlier of her decisions to cast outside the department, as well as her reasons why. I feel a lesson was learned from this experience, and hopefully shows will be given more thought from now on.As mentioned in a post below, Courtnay Mariani has participated in our dance shows as a professional dancer, aiming to enhance the performance. This is not much different then Dan Pascoe being part of Dracula. The main...
Salvatore Infantino
Fri Mar 5 2010 11:53
I need to take a moment to correct a few grammitcal errors in my last posting. My opinion has not changed, though.

I think what everyone here is missing are two important points:
1) The article never questions Pascoe's ability to excellently portray either role.
2) The "one sidedness” of this story resulted after 3-4 weeks of journalists trying to contact Joe Dawson (chair), Naomi baker (professor) and Theresa Fallon (Artistic Director, Director of “Daracula”), all whom declined to comment therefore providing no additional information to complete the aforementioned "second side” to this story.
So, the problem breaks down this way:
The information in the article is sound. You can't deny the facts- Fallon allowed Pascoe to audition for the show, as a Wilkes alum. Let's also consider that I’m fairly certain none of you knew of this "open casting" policy that apparently existed, since Joe and Theresa RARELY considered any non theater member to audition unless in total desperation to bolster ensemble. At least in those cases, cast members were paying students (usually). Let us not lose sight that this is a learning environment- therefore, we should build the best show with what we have available. If you open up auditions as they do in the “real world of Broadway” as Mr. DiMarco pointed out, the non equity Theater in the Dorothy Dickson Darte center is no longer a learning environment. Instead, it has joined the ranks of its sister playhouses “The Musix Box” and “Little Theater” and becomes a community theater.
So, leaving the auditions listed as “open” removes the learning environment all together, and allows community members free access to a show payed for by YOUR tuition. (and in parts, mine and my fellow non theater majors).
Featuring professionals, such as Courtnay Mariani in the Spring 09 Dance concert is a different story: students going in to the classes are made aware that a professional will join the cast to enhance the overall aesthetic.
It can also be said that bringing in alumni Such as Pascoe asserts a camaraderie which offers comfort to incoming students. A comfort to know they can always turn to Wilkes for guidance, friendship and support.
But doing it in such a way that takes a lead from a paying student is discouraging. If it had been announced that Pascoe was to be a “featured professional” in weeks prior to auditions, as was Mariani, I would agree that Layton is overreacting.
However, pulling a graduate in to fill a void, which could have easily become Layton’s greatest acting challenge is unfair. Also, I would guess that had any female alum been brought back to play a lead this year would have caused the same reaction. Also, I must applaud Layton for his reserve in weathering the aftermath of this article (as well as alumni Chris Lucas, who luckily does not have to face it daily).
Having said all of that, Dan Pascoe did nothing wrong and is at no fault. I myself could not find time to see Putnam, but I hear he was a hilarious addition to the cast. I also do not doubt his ability to expertly play Dracula… that does not mean I am not convinced that someone has not made a mistake. All blame lies in the administration of the department. A little more organization and concern for paying students would go a long way.

Shawn Senning
Thu Mar 4 2010 06:50
Long Gone........John Layton QUIT. Not professional at all. More like poor sport. So, if you're talking professional, you might want to rethink being a Layton fan. And step up to the plate and post your name.
far far away
Wed Mar 3 2010 21:18
Here's the main issue that I have with this entire thing...and being a former theater student of Wilkes University, I know what I am talking about when I say this. The department picks the season before the fall semester even begins. The department knows 75% of its students and their student's abilities as performers. The only class in question is the incoming freshman class because they are new and the professors really haven't had any 1-on-1 time with them. Knowing this information, and seeing how they are theater professors and should be well-educated, they should be able to choose shows that would not only showcase their students, but also help them learn and grow as performers. So, for instance, if you don't have any singer/dancers, you probably should try to perform a show like "Chicago" or "A Chorus Line", seeing how they are heavy dance shows. In the case of Dracula, a show that is primarily men should not be chosen if you don't have the number of men to cast. It just comes down to common sense really. The show selection is what should be in question.

As for Spelling Bee, the director was thrown into a tail spin I'm sure when Mr. Layton quit. I've been in shows where people have quit...and it's hard to replace them on such short notice. If Mr. Pascoe was the best fit, then by all means, use him. I'm sorry I missed seeing such a great performance of this show. I've only heard good things about it.

Long Gone
Wed Mar 3 2010 01:30
So,
I was a theater major at Wilkes when I was a freshman in college...I luckily decided to transfer and have never been so happy to have made that leap. Most if any of the theater majors who attend there and are still thinking that the department is actually a professional atmosphere know exactly who this is. I loved living in Wilkes-Barre. I loved my friends and I loved my social life. But going to class made me want to throw up. I learned more in high school about theater than I did in the Darte and I felt as if i was being judged all the time. I have never been able to write anyone a letter or even make a phone call about this, so this article was the straw that broke the camels back.

When I was informed through the grape vine that Dan Pascoe was put as leads... the first thing I thought wasn't ' wow look at this they just get more and more unprofessional as it goes on' but something simpler, something more realistic...I came to the rationalization of "Wow, its awesome how they are showing the public one of their graduates cant get a theater job so has now returned to do plays at his COLLEGE and not go into the real world to pursue his 'dreams' of being a semi good actor.' PATHETIC is the only word able to describe this situation.

John Layton I think so highly of you and so proud that you got out...It's an amazing breathe of fresh air.

And this article needed to be written along time ago...

THE END! (bows)

Shawn Senning
Tue Mar 2 2010 18:56
The two best shows EVER at Wilkes............ Spelling Bee and Godspell (1978) with alum Bruce Phair. It is the casting director's decision as to who would be best in a particular role. Clearly, when the pool is too small from which to choose, they go elsewhere. In addition, alum are very much a part of the Wilkes family.....some of them are the reason that others get the opportunity to even go to Wilkes. If you are a theatre major at Wilkes (as opposed to being a theatre major at UArts, Juilliard, UNCSA, CCM, Michigan, Loyola Marymount, Marymount Manhattan, NYU, etc....), you might want to re-think the reason that you are at Wilkes. Wilkes, with its beautiful theatre and some excellent productions, is not exactly the reason that someone is going to make it to Broadway. Of course there is always that chance that someone will make it big, but probably not because they were a theatre major at Wilkes University in Wilkes-Barre, PA! In fact, I didn't even realize that you had to audition to get into the theatre department. Do you? I am an alum (class of 78), and I would NEVER, in my wildest dreams have ever questioned the integrity of the director of Godspell.....casting Bruce as Jesus. He was the best. Questioning a director's choice is a sure way to never be cast again. The theatre world is a small world. Best of luck to Layton as he moves forward with his career. By the way, Peyton Manning would never try out for the football team for free.
Alyssa Glueck
Tue Mar 2 2010 11:46
Obviously, you are talking about an issue you were not fully informed about. The dept. can cast anyone they want. The community member cast was cast because NOBODY else could have possibly played that role! It was a poor show choice. The dept should have picked a show that could have been cast entirely within the dept. But since they didn't it was better that they cast someone who can believably portray the character of Dracula. I attended the auditions, and let me tell you, John was no Dracula, his audition was sub-par. And it has nothing to do with him being "poorly trained". Some people just aren't born with a gift for acting. John didn't get the part he wanted and he cried about it and tried to turn it into a big scandal. That is unprofessional. In the real world an actor will get rejected many times more than they will get cast. Sorry he can't accept reality. It's a good thing he changed his major since he obviously can't handle theatre.

As for the same community member being cast as Chip in Putnam, HE WAS DOING US A FAVOR. John gave up a great role in Putnam because he was being a whiney baby, leaving the cast, crew, and director hanging! We had been working on a show and he just quit leaving us stranded, quickly trying to replace him so we could actually put on the show we worked so hard on. Dan was doing us a favor accepting the part on such short notice. Otherwise we would have had no show! As for Austin who was asked to audition for Chip again after John quit, he just simply couldn't handle the intense music.

I am disappointed in the Beacon for writing an article on a subject they haven't clearly researched. The Wilkes University Theatre Dept. students are just as much a part of this university as everyone else and should be supported by their fellow university members. Who ever wrote this smear campaign should not be proud. They may feel like they are "uncovering the truth" and "exposing a scandal", everything a journalist dreams of, but instead all they have accomplished is a slam article. After I read this monstrosity I talked to many other theatre majors, who are all as equally upset as I am that the Beacon published such a poorly researched article. So next time you want to make yourself feel good by "exposing the truth" pick an actual scandal, like your idiocy.

Anonymous Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 10:19
Somehow I'm not surprised that the Beacon would jump all over this story. As an alumni of Wilkes university, and NOT in the Theater Arts Department, I had a few journalism classes while attending Wilkes. While in one of my classes, I in fact had several of the Beacon students in my class, and all were commenting negatively on the department (Theater Arts Department). While in class, Beacon writers, editors, and staff, were discussing how the theater department are a bunch of "freaks" and "weirdos". The discussion also went on to talk about how no one goes to see their shows, and no one likes to even go over in the building (The Darte) because they feel awkward about the students.

Also, I understand you are attending Wilkes, and you FEEL they should only auditions and cast Wilkes students, but what do you think will happen in the real world? I also find this quote humors, “We all go to Wilkes and if we’re not good enough to play this part, are they training us the right way?” Obviously they are, because if the teachers felt he wasn't good enough, therefore he was not picked for the role. What do you think will happen when you go to audition in a major city somewhere else? If, Mr. Layton is a Junior, that means he has another year to go back to the drawing board, say I wasn't good enough for their standards, what can I do to work harder, improve where I'm considered weak, and get the education I deserve.

I feel the teachers are being wrongly accused. They (The Teachers) want to put on the best performance they possibly can at Wilkes University. If the teachers felt that Layton wasn't strong enough for the part, then why would they put him in the role? What would that be teaching him as a student, more importantly as an actor? After reading this article, I think the Beacon missed the big picture, and should have titled this article, "Theater Arts at Wilkes University is the real deal" and discussed that teachers in the theater arts department WILL and DO, challenge their students to stride to be the best.

Instead this article seems to be more of a smear campaign on the Theater Arts Department, which I can't seem to wrap my mind around, because these are your fellow students, who just like the Beacon represent your University, and after hearing what many Beacon writers felt about the department, and then reading this article, it seemed more like a golden opportunity to bash the department, instead of informing possible recruits, major changes, and next years freshman to join not only the department, but Wilkes University as well.

Anthony DiMarco
Tue Mar 2 2010 10:06
Somehow I'm not surprised that the Beacon would jump all over this story. As an alumni of Wilkes university, and NOT in the Theater Arts Department, I had a few journalism classes while attending Wilkes. While in one of my classes, I in fact had several of the Beacon students in my class, and all were commenting negatively on the department (Theater Arts Department). While in class, Beacon writers, editors, and staff, were discussing how the theater department are a bunch of "freaks" and "weirdos". The discussion also went on to talk about how no one goes to see their shows, and no one likes to even go over in the building (The Darte) because they feel awkward about the students.
Also, I understand you are attending Wilkes, and you FEEL they should only auditions and cast Wilkes students, but what do you think will happen in the real world? I also find this quote humors, “We all go to Wilkes and if we’re not good enough to play this part, are they training us the right way?” Obviously they are, because if the teachers felt he wasn't good enough, therefore he was not picked for the role. What do you think will happen when you go to audition in a major city somewhere else? If, Mr. Layton is a Junior, that means he has another year to go back to the drawing board, say I wasn't good enough for their standards, what can I do to work harder, improve where I'm considered weak, and get the education I deserve.

I feel the teachers are being wrongly accused. They (The Teachers) want to put on the best performance they possibly can at Wilkes University. If the teachers felt that Layton wasn't strong enough for the part, then why would they put him in the role? What would that be teaching him as a student, more importantly as an actor? After reading this article, I think the Beacon missed the big picture, and should have titled this article, "Theater Arts at Wilkes University is the real deal" and discussed that teachers in the theater arts department WILL and DO, challenge their students to stride to be the best.

Instead this article seems to be more of a smear campaign on the Theater Arts Department, which I can't seem to wrap my mind around, because these are your fellow students, who just like the Beacon represent your University, and after hearing what many Beacon writers felt about the department, and then reading this article, it seemed more like a golden opportunity to bash the department, instead of informing possible recruits, major changes, and next years freshman to join not only the department, but Wilkes University as well.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In