On Friday, January 22, students of Wilkes University took to the stage to audition for various parts in the school's upcoming theatre production,
Dracula, which will be presented this April.
Junior John Layton had planned on trying out for the lead role and was surprised to find a familiar face reading for the same spot—Daniel Pascoe, a graduate of the Class of 2009.
Having only previously worked with current Wilkes undergraduate students - and occasionally a child or two from the Conservatory - in Wilkes productions, Layton said he questioned the audition policy and was told that auditions for Dracula were open to the public, meaning anyone from the surrounding community could audition for a part.
According to Layton, this was the first he heard of an open audition policy. Of the four productions held this year—The Love of the Nightingale, Brenda Bly: Teen Detective, The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee and Dracula—Layton said that Pascoe was the only community member who auditioned for a role.
The Visual and Performing Arts Department's page on the Wilkes Web site states that the department "is committed to nurturing a climate in which a community of artists-educators, diverse student population, and the public-at-large engage in art, dance, music, and theatre."
While this statement mentions that the "public-at-large" are allowed to "engage" in the department's productions, it does not distinguish between engaging as part of the audience or as a member of the cast.
Several attempts were made to contact members of the Visual and Performing Arts Department to clarify the auditioning policy, but faculty declined to share details of the casting process with The Beacon.
Despite the unclear rules that may be in place regarding casting, current and former theatre majors feel that the casting of alumni or members of the community in a Wilkes production is unfair.
Christopher Lucas, Class of 2007, sent a letter to The Beacon to air his feelings on the situation.
"There are students that are paying over $100,000 over the course of their four-year stint at Wilkes University for a quality education and I feel by casting an alumnus, you are not only cheating them out of their money, but cheating them out of a quality education," Lucas, a theatre graduate. "It feels as though part of the money that they are putting in as a student is being handed over to the alumnus actor."
Layton agreed, stating that current students should be given these opportunities to prepare them for their careers. He added that holding open auditions for a student production does not make sense because student productions should be filled by students.
"I'm sure the [Wilkes] football team would love to have Peyton Manning come and play if they were allowed to have open try outs," said Layton.
Lucas also added in his letter that casting former Wilkes students or members of the community weighs on current students' confidence levels. He said that Wilkes students may think that the directors may feel that they "do not currently have the talent pool amongst their current students to be able to play a lead role in a main stage production" and must search elsewhere to fulfill these roles.
Layton agreed. "We all go to Wilkes and if we're not good enough to play this part, are they training us the right way?" he asked.
With an open audition policy, Layton questioned how Wilkes' theatre productions are any different from those put on by community theatres. Representatives of the department would not provide The Beacon with information that would clarify the differences between these two types of productions.
Upset with the decision to cast a non-Wilkes student in Dracula, Layton said he contacted Joseph Dawson, chair of the Visual and Performing Arts department, for further clarification on the audition policies. But when he didn't get a direct answer regarding the policy, he told Dawson he would not feel comfortable attending rehearsal for The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee.
"He called me back and gave me the ultimatum-that if I wasn't at rehearsal, then I wasn't in the production. And I decided not to go," said Layton.
Layton not only chose to abandon his part in Putnam County, but also to leave the department entirely. Layton said he has decided to drop theatre and will soon declare an English major. He has also considered transferring to another college or university.
After leaving Putnam County, Layton said he expected that one of the two assistant stage managers would fulfill his empty role. Although there are no formal understudies for Wilkes productions, assistant stage managers act as such and are prepared and willing to fill deserted positions.
"People have told me that [Tony Goreczny] was preparing [to fill Layton's role] and was rehearsing," said Layton.
Goreczny, a freshman theatre major and one of the assistant stage managers for Putnam County, was not called upon to play the part, however. Instead, Pascoe picked up where Layton left off.
"I consider the theater department's choice of replacing John Layton with Daniel Pascoe to be a slap in the face [to Layton], considering the fact that John left his major after the unexpected Dracula event," said Austin Loukas, a freshman psychology major who tried out for Layton's empty role in Putnam County before Pascoe was given the role.
Both Goreczny and Pascoe declined to comment on these, or any other, matters.
Numerous attempts were made to contact Teresa Fallon, director of the upcoming Dracula, but phone calls and emails were not returned. Dawson was the director of Putnam County, but declined to comment on the situation.




is a member of the 



11 comments Log in to Comment
1) The article never questions Pascoe's ability to excellently portray either role.
2) The "one sidedness” of this story resulted after 3-4 weeks of journalists trying to contact Joe Dawson (chair), Naomi baker (professor) and Theresa Fallon (Artistic Director, Director of “Daracula”), all whom declined to comment therefore providing no additional information to complete the aforementioned "second side” to this story.
So, the problem breaks down this way:
The information in the article is sound. You can't deny the facts- Fallon allowed Pascoe to audition for the show, as a Wilkes alum. Let's also consider that I’m fairly certain none of you knew of this "open casting" policy that apparently existed, since Joe and Theresa RARELY considered any non theater member to audition unless in total desperation to bolster ensemble. At least in those cases, cast members were paying students (usually). Let us not lose sight that this is a learning environment- therefore, we should build the best show with what we have available. If you open up auditions as they do in the “real world of Broadway” as Mr. DiMarco pointed out, the non equity Theater in the Dorothy Dickson Darte center is no longer a learning environment. Instead, it has joined the ranks of its sister playhouses “The Musix Box” and “Little Theater” and becomes a community theater.
So, leaving the auditions listed as “open” removes the learning environment all together, and allows community members free access to a show payed for by YOUR tuition. (and in parts, mine and my fellow non theater majors).
Featuring professionals, such as Courtnay Mariani in the Spring 09 Dance concert is a different story: students going in to the classes are made aware that a professional will join the cast to enhance the overall aesthetic.
It can also be said that bringing in alumni Such as Pascoe asserts a camaraderie which offers comfort to incoming students. A comfort to know they can always turn to Wilkes for guidance, friendship and support.
But doing it in such a way that takes a lead from a paying student is discouraging. If it had been announced that Pascoe was to be a “featured professional” in weeks prior to auditions, as was Mariani, I would agree that Layton is overreacting.
However, pulling a graduate in to fill a void, which could have easily become Layton’s greatest acting challenge is unfair. Also, I would guess that had any female alum been brought back to play a lead this year would have caused the same reaction. Also, I must applaud Layton for his reserve in weathering the aftermath of this article (as well as alumni Chris Lucas, who luckily does not have to face it daily).
Having said all of that, Dan Pascoe did nothing wrong and is at no fault. I myself could not find time to see Putnam, but I hear he was a hilarious addition to the cast. I also do not doubt his ability to expertly play Dracula… that does not mean I am not convinced that someone has not made a mistake. All blame lies in the administration of the department. A little more organization and concern for paying students would go a long way.
I was a theater major at Wilkes when I was a freshman in college...I luckily decided to transfer and have never been so happy to have made that leap. Most if any of the theater majors who attend there and are still thinking that the department is actually a professional atmosphere know exactly who this is. I loved living in Wilkes-Barre. I loved my friends and I loved my social life. But going to class made me want to throw up. I learned more in high school about theater than I did in the Darte and I felt as if i was being judged all the time. I have never been able to write anyone a letter or even make a phone call about this, so this article was the straw that broke the camels back. When I was informed through the grape vine that Dan Pascoe was put as leads... the first thing I thought wasn't ' wow look at this they just get more and more unprofessional as it goes on' but something simpler, something more realistic...I came to the rationalization of "Wow, its awesome how they are showing the public one of their graduates cant get a theater job so has now returned to do plays at his COLLEGE and not go into the real world to pursue his 'dreams' of being a semi good actor.' PATHETIC is the only word able to describe this situation. John Layton I think so highly of you and so proud that you got out...It's an amazing breathe of fresh air.And this article needed to be written along time ago...THE END! (bows)
Also, I understand you are attending Wilkes, and you FEEL they should only auditions and cast Wilkes students, but what do you think will happen in the real world? I also find this quote humors, “We all go to Wilkes and if we’re not good enough to play this part, are they training us the right way?” Obviously they are, because if the teachers felt he wasn't good enough, therefore he was not picked for the role. What do you think will happen when you go to audition in a major city somewhere else? If, Mr. Layton is a Junior, that means he has another year to go back to the drawing board, say I wasn't good enough for their standards, what can I do to work harder, improve where I'm considered weak, and get the education I deserve. I feel the teachers are being wrongly accused. They (The Teachers) want to put on the best performance they possibly can at Wilkes University. If the teachers felt that Layton wasn't strong enough for the part, then why would they put him in the role? What would that be teaching him as a student, more importantly as an actor? After reading this article, I think the Beacon missed the big picture, and should have titled this article, "Theater Arts at Wilkes University is the real deal" and discussed that teachers in the theater arts department WILL and DO, challenge their students to stride to be the best.Instead this article seems to be more of a smear campaign on the Theater Arts Department, which I can't seem to wrap my mind around, because these are your fellow students, who just like the Beacon represent your University, and after hearing what many Beacon writers felt about the department, and then reading this article, it seemed more like a golden opportunity to bash the department, instead of informing possible recruits, major changes, and next years freshman to join not only the department, but Wilkes University as well.
Also, I understand you are attending Wilkes, and you FEEL they should only auditions and cast Wilkes students, but what do you think will happen in the real world? I also find this quote humors, “We all go to Wilkes and if we’re not good enough to play this part, are they training us the right way?” Obviously they are, because if the teachers felt he wasn't good enough, therefore he was not picked for the role. What do you think will happen when you go to audition in a major city somewhere else? If, Mr. Layton is a Junior, that means he has another year to go back to the drawing board, say I wasn't good enough for their standards, what can I do to work harder, improve where I'm considered weak, and get the education I deserve. I feel the teachers are being wrongly accused. They (The Teachers) want to put on the best performance they possibly can at Wilkes University. If the teachers felt that Layton wasn't strong enough for the part, then why would they put him in the role? What would that be teaching him as a student, more importantly as an actor? After reading this article, I think the Beacon missed the big picture, and should have titled this article, "Theater Arts at Wilkes University is the real deal" and discussed that teachers in the theater arts department WILL and DO, challenge their students to stride to be the best.Instead this article seems to be more of a smear campaign on the Theater Arts Department, which I can't seem to wrap my mind around, because these are your fellow students, who just like the Beacon represent your University, and after hearing what many Beacon writers felt about the department, and then reading this article, it seemed more like a golden opportunity to bash the department, instead of informing possible recruits, major changes, and next years freshman to join not only the department, but Wilkes University as well.
You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now